Pinus ponderosa does not always support dendrochronology [electronic resource].

By: Description: p.23-32Uniform titles:
  • Agricultural research journal, Suez Canal University, 2011 v.11(2) [electronic resource].
Subject(s): Online resources: In: Agricultural Research Journal, Suez Canal University 2011 v.11(2)Summary: A mature open-grown Pinus ponderosa tree was felled in winter 2009, Sidi Arhoma Farm, Al-Marg-Libya. A Disc at 0.5 m above ground of its trunk was removed, and transferred to the laboratory. Time series of ring widths over four radii, 90° to one another, from pith outwards were plotted. Tree-ring data from this study do not support three key assumptions made by dendrochronology: 1) Standardization of master chronologies: 2) The assumption tha: any smgle radius is highly representative of the trunk as a whole, and 3) Cross-dating done on the basis of what dendrochronologists have perceived to be "sensitive" rings.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Includes references.

A mature open-grown Pinus ponderosa tree was felled in winter 2009, Sidi Arhoma Farm, Al-Marg-Libya. A Disc at 0.5 m above ground of its trunk was removed, and transferred to the laboratory. Time series of ring widths over four radii, 90° to one another, from pith outwards were plotted. Tree-ring data from this study do not support three key assumptions made by dendrochronology: 1) Standardization of master chronologies: 2) The assumption tha: any smgle radius is highly representative of the trunk as a whole, and 3) Cross-dating done on the basis of what dendrochronologists have perceived to be "sensitive" rings.

1

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
Share

Home | About ENAL | Collections | Services | Activities | Calendar | Contact us

7 Nadi El Sayed St., Giza, Egypt | Phone:02-33351121 +02-33351313 | 
| Email: enalegypt@gmail.com