Development of an electric sprayer for greenhouse and small open field / [electronic resource].
Language: English Summary language: Arabic Description: p.767-784Other title:- تطوير آلة رش كهربائية للصوب الزراعية و المزارع الصغيرة [Added title page title]
- Misr journal of agricultural engineering, 2017 v.34 (2) [electronic resource].
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles
|
Main | ART MJAE V34 No2 12 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available |
Includes references.
Hand-held and backpack sprayers are ineJ.pensive tools used to apply
pesticides on small acreages, Greenhouse, small vegetables field, small
orchards, and tree plantations are examples of areas that o.fien require
pesticide applications to protect them from weeds, insects, and diseases.
Effective pest control dependf on applying the proper amount o.f
pesticide. In greenhouse conditions inside are d!(ferent from open field.
The conventional sprayers, such as the self-propelled or tractor mounted
boom sprayers are not suitable for a greenhouse conditions. The electric
developed sprayer was evaluated, and its performance was investigated
and compared to Su=uki 2.13 kJV air assist knapsack sprayer. The
experiments were carried Ollt at during 201512016 seasons. The
developed hydraulic sprayer may able to operate as vertical and
hori=ontal boom sprayer. It's able to apply in piper crops in greenhouse
and smallfield area ofCabbage (Brassica Oleracea val'. Capitata) under
Egyptian conditions. The reslilts showed that the hori=ontal boom set
gal'e high value ofdeposition compared to vertical boom set. As well as,
, the increasing of operating pressure tends to increase the deposition
,,: values for developed solar sprayer. The deposit spray vallles under open
field conditions were 0.1 33pg/cm2
, O. I87pglcm2 and 0.208pglcm2
. The
coverage values under open field conditions were 37.8%, 39.1% and
44.5%for 125 kPa, 150 kPa and 200 kPa operating no==le pressures
respectively. As well as, the coverage percent values under greenhouse
conditions were 27.8 %, 29.7% and 33.8 %for 125 kPa, 150 kPa and
200 kPa operating ncr-=le pressures respectively. The.power consumed
was 0.263 kW, 0.289 kWand 0.300 kWat 125 kPa. 150 kPa and 200 kPa
respectively. As well as the batte,)' power reduction rate were 0.051 and
0.164 with PV panel charger under small open field and greenhouse
l' after one hOllr operating time respectively. ,i
Keywords: sprayer, greenhouse, electrical sprayer.
Summary in Arabic.
There are no comments on this title.