02679cab a2200313Ia 4500001000800000003000600008008004100014040000800055041001300063090002700076100002500103240021900128245016400347246018800511300001400699504002500713520126100738546002301999650003702022650002902059650002202088650002702110700002002137773009102157856008202248596000602330942001202336999001702348u188582SIRSI110102s2006    ua     ss b         eng d  aEAL  aengbara  aART EJAR V84 NO1 B SP11 aKhalafalla, M. M. E.10aEgyptian journal of agricultural research, 2006 v. 84 (1) B, Special issueh[electronic resource]:b1st Scientific Conference on Modern Attitudes in Aquaculture: Sharm El-Sheikh, 13-15 December 2006: Special issue.10aUse of (olive cake, sugar beet pulp and molasses) as non-conventional energy feed sources in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) dietsh[electronic resource].15aأستخدام تفل الزيتون وتفل البنجر والمولاس كمصادر غير تقليدية للطاقة في علائق أسماك البلطي النيلي.  ap.295-309  aIncludes references.  aThis study was designed to determine the effect of practically replacing yellow corn with non-conventional energy sources at (10,20% Olive cake and 10,20% Sugar beet pulp with or without 3% Molasses). A total number of 180 Nile tilapia (2g) were randomly distributed into nine experimental treatment groups each in two replicates, and were fed daily at a rate of 3% of fish live body weight through 10 week experimental period, to study the effect of nine diets contained 32% crude protein on growth performance, feed utilization, body composition and economical efficiency. The results showed that yellow corn energy could be replaced by (10 and 20% Olive cake), without harmful effect on the performance and feed utilization of fish. Results also showed that best growth performance was recoded with control groups followed by fish fed diets containing (10, 20% Olive cake). But the diets contained (10, 20% Sugar beet pulp) and (10, 20% Sugar beet puip and 3% Molasses) showed the lowest values of growth performance and protein utilization. Carcass composition of the experimental fish was relatively affected by different dietary treatments. Cost benefit analysis showed that low profit index and high incidence cost were obtained by the control diet.  aSummary in Arabic. 0aNile tilapiaxFeeding and feeds. 0aNile tilapiaxNutrition. 0aMolasses as feed. 0aCrop residues as feed.1 aSalem, M. F. E.0 Egyptian journal of agricultural research. g2006.v.84(1)B,SPx0111-63367nnaswu15858540uhttp://nile.enal.sci.eg/EALE/2006/EJAR/8406/SI/1B/295.pdfzFull Text Article.  a1  cAR2lcc  c43433d43433