02085cab a2200325Ia 4500001000800000003000600008008004100014040000800055041001300063090002600076100002300102240009300125245010600218246012000324300001500444504002300459520091400482546002301396650002301419650002001442650002001462700002301482700002501505700002201530773009101552856008101643596000601724942001201730999001701742u211828SIRSI091014s2015    ua     ss b   0     eng d  aEAL  aengbara  aART MJAR V40 NO1 P2 81 aEl-Zemrany, H. M. 10aMinufiya journal of agricultural research, 2015 v.40 (1)nPart 2h[electronic resource].10aEvaluation of certain local bacterial strains as diazotrophs for wheat plantsh[electronic resource].15aتقييم سلالات بكتيرية معينة كمثبتات نيتروجين جوى لنباتات القمح.  aP.263-278.  aIncludes reference  aNine identified bacterial strains were selected out of 48 isolates collected from various areas in the upper Western region of the Nile Delta in Egypt. Such 9 strains proved to be the most biofertilizing bacterial agents among all via laboratory examinations. A greenhouse pot experiment was carried out in order to ascertain the capability of those strains as effective diazotrophs for wheat plants. Influence of soil moisture content and salinity was included. Nitrogen contents in plant shoots and in rhizosphere soil, as well as dehdrogenase activity, had been determined at two growth periods, i.e. 60 and 120 days of planting. The results revealed that the strain "D 2" ( Azotobacter chroococcum DSM 2286), "D9"( Enterobacter kobei CIP), "M3"( Bacillus megaterium EIF18), "N4" (Clostridium sp.), and "W2" (Klebsiella sp.), were, descendingly the most efficient strains, under all experimental variables.  aSummary in arabic. 0aWheatxFertilzers. 0aBiofertilizers. 0aDehydrogenases.1 aEl-Shinnawi, M. M.1 aAbou Husssien, E. A.1 aAbdel-Whab, B. A.0 tMinufiya journal of agricultural research. g2015.v.40(1)P.2x1110-02657nnaswu15815140uhttp://nile.enal.sci.eg/EALE/2015/MJAR/4015/1/P2/263.pdfzFull Text Article.  a1  cAR2lcc  c60773d60773