02284cab a2200289Ia 4500001000800000003000600008008004100014040000800055041001300063100001600076240009300092245010400185246015000289300001200439504002500451520112300476546002301599650005401622650005001676650001901726650002201745650001501767700001901782700002001801773009601821856007701917u212872SIRSI101023s2016    ua     ss b         eng d  aEAL  aengbara1 aAwad, M. A.10aMinufiya journal of agricultural research, 2016 v.41 (1)nPart 1h[electronic resource].10aPlant extracts as antifungal factors against postharvest cucumber fruit roth[electronic resource].15aالمستخلصات النباتية كمضادات للفطريات المسببة لعفن الثمار في الخيار بعد الحصاد.  aP.1-15.  aIncludes references.  aEight plant extract materials were involved in these studies to control cucumber fruit rot disease i.e., Cinnamon, Ginger, Thyme, Marjoram, Clove, Garlic, Galls and Nigella. The most aggressive fungal pathogen isolates from seven pathogenic fungi were tested in these trials i.e., Fusarium moniliforme (isolate 2), Fusarium oxysporium (isolate 1), Fusarium solani (isolate 1), Fusarium subglutinans (isolate 1), Botrytis cinerea (isolate 3), Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (isolate 3) and Macrophomina phaseo/ina. Three concentrations of each plant extract i.e.3, 5 and 10% were used in these experiments. All plant extracts were effective in growth inhibition of the seven fungal pathogens and various in effects with the three tested concentrations. The most effective plant extract was Garlic at the three tested concentration followed by Thyme on most of the tested fugal pathogen in petri dish under laboratory conditions. All tested plant extracts were affected on disease index; Galls followed by Thyme were the most effective extracts at 3% concentration.   Key words: Cucumber fruit rot, biocontrol, plant extracts.  aSummary in Arabic. 0aCucumbersxDiseases and pestsxBiological control 0aCucumbersxPostharvest diseases and injuries. 0aPlant extracts 0aAntifungal agents 3aplant rots1 aKhalifa, E. Z.1 aShebl, Asmaa M.0 tMinufiya Journal of Agricultural Research. g2016.v.41(1)nPart 1x1110-02657nnaswu15815140uhttp://nile.enal.sci.eg/EALE/2016/MJAR/4116/1p1/1.pdfzFull Text Article