<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02664cab a2200337Ia 45 0</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">u212887</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">SIRSI</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">101023s2016    ua     ss b         eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">EAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">ara</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ART MJAR V41 No1 Pt1 11</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">AbdelKader, M. A. I.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="240" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Minufiya journal of agricultural research, 2016 v.41 (1)</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">Part 1</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">[electronic resource].</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Effect of intercropping pattern and phosphorus fertilizer rate on growth, yield, active ingredients and some competitive indices of dill and fenugreek plants</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">[electronic resource].</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="5">
    <subfield code="a">&#x62A;&#x623;&#x62B;&#x64A;&#x631; &#x646;&#x638;&#x627;&#x645; &#x627;&#x644;&#x62A;&#x62D;&#x645;&#x64A;&#x644; &#x648;&#x645;&#x639;&#x62F;&#x644; &#x627;&#x644;&#x633;&#x645;&#x627;&#x62F; &#x627;&#x644;&#x641;&#x648;&#x633;&#x641;&#x627;&#x62A;&#x649; &#x639;&#x644;&#x649; &#x627;&#x644;&#x646;&#x645;&#x648; &#x648;&#x627;&#x644;&#x645;&#x62D;&#x635;&#x648;&#x644; &#x648;&#x627;&#x644;&#x645;&#x648;&#x627;&#x62F; &#x627;&#x644;&#x641;&#x639;&#x627;&#x644;&#x629; &#x648;&#x628;&#x639;&#x636; &#x627;&#x644;&#x639;&#x644;&#x627;&#x642;&#x627;&#x62A; &#x627;&#x644;&#x62A;&#x646;&#x627;&#x641;&#x633;&#x64A;&#x629; &#x644;&#x646;&#x628;&#x627;&#x62A;&#x627;&#x62A; &#x627;&#x644;&#x634;&#x628;&#x62A; &#x648;&#x627;&#x644;&#x62D;&#x644;&#x628;&#x629;.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">P.141-160.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="504" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Includes references.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The present work was conducted at the Experimental Farm, Faculty of Agriculture (Ghazala Farm), Zagazig University during two seasons of 2012/2013 and 2013/2014. The effect of intercropping patterns of dill and fenugreek at ratios of 1:1, 1:2, 2:1 and 2:2 on alternative rows in comparison with sole cropped of each species and different phosphorus fertilization rates (0. 0, 30 and 45 P20s kg/feddan) and their combination treatments on growth, yield components, active ingredients as well as some competitive indices of both tested crops were studied. Application of 45 P205 kg/feddan caused significant increase in all of the measured parameters of dill and fenugreek over the other rates under study. lntercropping pattern 1:2 (dill:fenugreek), in most cases, significantly (p?0.05) increased the recorded growth parameters, yield components, trigonilline content of fenugreek and volatile oil percentage and yield per plant of dill fruits as well as competition indices of the two components in the two seasons, whereas all intercropping patterns significantly (p?O.05) decreased seed, fruit and oil yield per feddan compared to sole stands (control).   Key words: Dill, Fenugreek, lntercropping patterns, Phosphorus, Competitive indices.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Summary in Arabic.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Fenugreek</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Growth</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Fenugreek</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Yields.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Fenugreek</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Fertilizers.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Dill</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Growth</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Dill</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Yields.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Dill</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Fertilizers.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Phosphatic fertilizers.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Hassan, H. M. S.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="t">Minufiya Journal of Agricultural Research. </subfield>
    <subfield code="g">2016.v.41(1)</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">Part 1</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">1110-0265</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">nnas</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">u158151</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="u">http://nile.enal.sci.eg/EALE/2016/MJAR/4116/1p1/141.pdf</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">Full Text Article</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="596" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">alc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">ENAL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">ENAL</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2019-12-11</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">ART MJAR V41 No1 Pt1 11</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2019-12-11 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2019-12-11</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">61592</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">61592</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
