000			03003cab a2200337Ia 45 0
001			u188187
003			SIRSI
008			101222s2006 ua ss b eng d
040			_aEAL
041			_aeng _bara
043			_af-ua
090			_aART AUJAS V14 NO1 32
100	1		_aMahgoob, A. E. A.
240	1	0	_aArab universities journal of agricultural sciences, 2006 v. 14 (1) _h[electronic resource].
245	1	0	_aMite fauna associated with some domestic and wild agricultural animals and their habitat in Egypt _h[electronic resource].
246	1	5	_aالأكاروسات المصاحبة لبعض الحيوانات الزراعية البرية والمستأنسة وبيئاتها فى مصر.
300			_ap.475-490.
504			_aIncludes references.
520			_aRandom samples were collected from Giza Qualubyia and Minufyia Governorates during summer, autumn and winter 2001. The collected samples were litter, poultry food and feather from chickens. ducks, pekeeny ducks, geese. rabbits (as a domestic animals) and quails. rozella birds, zebra birds and kockteel birds (as a wild animals which were in captivity). Mites belonging to twenty-seven families of four suborders; viz., Gamasida. Actinedida, Acaridida and Oribatida plus the hypopal stage of family Acaridae, were collected. Out of 27 families, 24, 14 and 11 were found in Qaliobia, Giza and Minufyia Governorates, respectively. However, number of mites, percentage of occurrence and dominance differentiated families in and between localities. Number of mites during autumn season was the highest representing 21 families followed by summer then winter. Hypopal stage represented about 20% of mite population in autumn season while no hypopal stage in summer but nil in winter. Litter harbored mites of all 27 families and hypopal stage which was not found in feather and food. The percentage of mites and hypopa! stage was 89.39% in litter. followed by feather (9.51%) then food (1.1%). Only 6 and 5 families were found in food and feather respectively, Feather of Pekeeny ducks harbored 49.5% of mites while chicken's feather harbored 42.6%. The percentage of mites in leftover food was 89% while it was 11% in food before feeding. The most common mite families in this study were Acaridae, Glycyphagidae Pyroglyphidae. Cheyletidae, Ascidae and Dermanyssidae. Declaration of the role of the animals under investigation and their habitat as a source of stored product mites also the dominance of occurrence ofthe recorded mite families were discussed in details.
546			_aSummary in Arabic.
650		0	_aMites _zEgypt.
650		0	_aDomestic animals.
650		0	_aAnimals, Wild.
650		0	_aMites _xBehavior.
700	1		_aTharwat, M. E.
700	1		_aKilany, Samia O.
700	1		_aHafez, T. S.
773	0		_tArab Universities Journal of Agricultural Science. _g2006.v.14(1) _x1110-2675 _7nnas _wu118374
856	4	0	_uhttp://nile.enal.sci.eg/EALE/2006/AUJAS/1406/1/475.pdf _zFull Text Article
596			_a1
942			_cAR _2lcc
999			_c43094 _d43094