000			02971cab a2200325Ia 45 0
001			u192403
003			SIRSI
008			110531s2010 ua ss b eng d
040			_aEAL
041			_aeng _bara
090			_aART AIJA SI 2010 6
100	1		_aKamal, S. M.
240	1	0	_aAbbassa international journal for aquaculture, 2010, Conference, Special issue _h[electronic resource]: _bThe third scientific conference, first resources, its role in food security and supporting Egyptian national economiy, Saleh Kamel center for Islamic Economics Al-Azhar University, Cairo 17-18 October 2010.
245	1	0	_aEvaluate of silkworm wastes on productive performance of nile tilapia (O. niloticus) fingerlings _h[electronic resource].
246	1	5	_aتقييم مخلفات دودة القز علي الاداء الانتاجي لاصباعيات البلطي النيلي.‪
300			_ap.93-110.
504			_aIncludes references.
520			_aA thirteen week trial was conducted in ten cement ponds 3 m3 each to investigate the effect of applied silkworm wastes on productive performance and economic efficjency of Nile tilapia (Oreocl1romis niloticus) fingeriings. In this experiment duplicated five treatments were applied; (T1) applied weekly with Silkworm litter at rate of 50 g I m3, (T2) applied with waste mulbeny leaf at rate of 50 gl m3 every week, (T3) applied weekly with mixed of Silkworm litter and waste mulberry leaf at rate of 50 g / m3 , (T4.) applied weekly with rigirs at rate of 50 g / m3 and control (T5) fed daily with diet 25% protein at a rate of 70/0 of fish body weight 5 days a week. The averdge initial weights of Nile tilapia fingerlings were 1.3 g. Results indicated that T, surpassed all treatments and recorded higher (P< 0.05) final body weight, total weight gain and ADG than the treatment T. and non significant higher (P> 0.05) thanT" T3 and Ts. Followed by Ts (control), T1 and T3, respectively. There were no significant differences between treatments in SGR. With regard to economic efficiency, Ts recorded the highest total cost however; T, recorded the highest net return and economic efficiency. In condusion, the use of silkworm wastes especially waste mulberry leaf in fish pond culture could be recommended for Nile tilapia at a rate of 50g /m3/ week (210 kg/ feddan / week) with fish stocking density 20 fish/ m3 (84000 fingerlings/ feddan), especially with the high cost of fish diets and the problems found now for fresh poultry manure.
546			_aSummary in Arabic.
650		0	_aNile tilapia _xGrowth.
650		0	_aNile tilapia _xFeeding and feeds.
650		0	_aNile tilapia _xNutrition.
650		0	_aSilkworms.
650		0	_aWaste products as feed.
700	1		_aMahmoud, A. A.
700	1		_aGhazy, U. M.
773	0		_tAbbassa international journal for aquaculture. _g2010,SI _x1687-7683 _7nnas _wu184097
856	4	0	_uhttp://nile.enal.sci.eg/EALE/2010/AIJA/si/93.pdf _zFull Text Article.
596			_a1
942			_cAR _2lcc
999			_c46240 _d46240