000 01713cab a2200265Ia 45 0
001 u195951
003 SIRSI
008 111019s2005 ua ss b eng d
040 _aEAL
041 _aeng
_bara
090 _aART MUJAS V30 No4 13
100 1 _aSallam, A. A.
240 1 0 _aMansoura University journal of agricultural sciences, 2005 v. 30 (4)
_h[electronic resource].
245 1 0 _aComparative between different techniques for pregnancy diagnosis in sheep
_h[electronic resource].
246 1 5 _aمقارنة طرق مختلفة لتشخيص الحمل فى الاغنام.‪
300 _aP. 1953-1960.
504 _aIncludes references.
520 _aThe aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of five different methods to diagnose pregnancy in sheep. A total of 466 of crossbred (Finnish x Rahmani) ewes were mated naturally in September (n=382) and May (n=84) mating season. Serum P4 concentrations at day 18 after mating were determined by RIA test. The ewes which showed blood P4 >1 ng were considered pregnant. Based on lambing data, the accuracy for diagnosing pregnant (positive) and non-pregnant ewes (negative) were 96.59 and 100% at day 18, respectively. By day 30 after breeding, an accuracy of 80 and 94.2% has been obtained for pregnant ewes using non-return to estrus as pregnancy diagnostic method at May and September mating season, respectively..
546 _aSummary in Arabic.
650 0 _aSheep
_xReproduction.
650 0 _aSheep
_xPregnancy
_xDiagnosis
773 0 _tMansoura Unviersity Journal of Agricultural Sciences.
_g2005.v.30(4)
_x1110-0346
_7nnas
_wu182197
856 4 0 _uhttp://nile.enal.sci.eg/EALE/2005/MUJAS/3005/4/1953.pdf
_zFull Text Article.
596 _a1
942 _cAR
_2lcc
999 _c49061
_d49061