000 nab a22 7a 4500
999 _c63143
_d63143
008 180708s2016 au ||||ss|||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aEAL
_cEAL
041 _aeng
_bara
090 _aART MJAE V33 No2 12
100 1 _aHassan , Mona M. A.
_919356
240 _aMisr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2016 v.33 (2)
_h[electronic resource]
245 1 0 _aEffect of different drying methods on the physical properties and quality of some fruit peels
_h[electronic resource]
246 1 5 _aتأثير طرق التجفيف المختلفة علي الخواص الفيزيائية والجودة لبعض قشور الثمار
300 _ap. 507-526 .
504 _aIncludes bibliographic reference
520 _aFruit peel represents approximately 30-•40 g/100g of the fresh fruit mass and could be used to develop value-added products rather than causing Pollution of the environment. fruit peels of orange, lemon. pomegranate and grapefruit were dried using two different drying methods (oven and microwave) under different fruit peels masses of50, 100, 150 and 200g in order to study the drying behavior in terms of specific energy. drying efficiency and product quality. Mathematical models of the oven and microwave dryers were investigated based on the experimental data in order to predict their performance. The obtained data revealed that the use of a microwave was accompanied with higher drying rates of fruit peels, higher drying efficiency and lower specific energy compared with electric oven. The best product quality was achieved in the case of using fruit peels of 50g in the microwave and 200g in the oven comparing with other peels masses. In oven, Newton and Henderson and Pabis models showed good agreement with orange and lemon, while Page and Modified Page (I) were the best descriptive models for pomegranate peels. Regard to the drying in microwave, Page and Modified Page (I) models showed good agreement with all fruit peels (orange. lemon, pomegranate and grapefruit).
546 _aSummary in Arabic
650 0 _aFruit
_xDrying
_919357
650 3 _afruit peels
_919688
700 1 _aWasfy , K. I.
_918848
773 0 _tMisr Journal of Agricultural Engineering.
_g2016.v.33(2)
_x1687-384X
_7nnas
_wu192786
856 4 0 _uhttp://nile.enal.sci.eg/EALE/2016/MJAE/3316/2/507.pdf
_zFull Text Article
942 _2alc
_cAR