000 cab a22 a 4500
999 _c63272
_d63272
001 u212596
003 ENAL
008 161019s2012 ua ss b eng d
040 _aEAL
_cEAL
041 _aeng
_bara
090 _aART MJAE No20 13
100 1 _aAbd EI-Mageed, Taia A.
_919940
240 1 0 _aMisr journal of agricultural engineering, 2015 (20)
_h[electronic resource].
245 1 0 _aEffect of drip deficit irrigation and mulching on soil salinity, yield and water use efficiency of squash (Cucurhita pepo L.) /
_h[electronic resource].
246 1 5 _aتأثير الرى المتناقص تحت نظام الرى بالتنقيط و التغطية على ملوحة التربة و المحصول و كفاءة استخدام الماء لنبات الكوسة
300 _ap.217-242
500 _aYear book of Misr Society of Agricultural Engineering : The 20 th. Annual Conference of the Misr Society of Agricultural Engineering "Agricultural Engineering and Country Challenges"
504 _aIncludes references.
520 _aYield and water-use efficiency ofsquash (Cucurbita pepo L.) under drip deficit irrigation and mulching were investigated Field experiments were conducted for two consecutive seasons (summer and fall), to study the effect of different mulches (without mulch, WM as a control, white polyethylene: PM, rice straw: RSM, farmyard manure: FYMj on growth, water-use efficiency (WUE) and yield of squash under three irrigation treatments. Amount of applied irrigation to each experimental plot depended upon a percentage ofETc computed using the equation ofAllen et al (1998) in addition to the leaching requirements and considering the irrigation application efficiency. Irrigation treatments were irrigation on basis of 100, 85 and 70 % of computed evapotranspiration. Plant photosynthesis efficiency, total soluble sugars (FSS), leaf area index, harvest index (HI), yield and WUE were not significantly affected by interaction between irrigation and mulching treatments. All mulching materials effectively reduced salt accumulation in the root zone. Mulching treatments markedly increased WUE and yield in the order of FYM> RSM> PM> WM Results showed that, irrigation ofsquash with 85 . the I8j strategy studied here could be succe~sfully applied during summer and fall seasons in commercial squash production allowing water savings of 15% without any detrimental effect on plant growth or yield.
546 _aSummary in Arabic
650 0 _aIrrigation
_919935
650 0 _aSoils, Salts in
_919941
650 0 _aSquashes
_919942
700 _aSemida, Wael M.
_919943
700 _aAbd EI-Wahed, Mohamed H.
_919944
773 0 _g2012.v. (20)
_tMisr Journal of Agricultural Engineering.
_wu192786
_x1687-384X
_7nnas
856 4 0 _uhttp://nile.enal.sci.eg/EALE/2012/MJAE//012/20/217.pdf
_zFull Text Article
942 _cAR
_2lcc