000			02093nab a2200277 a 4500
003			ENAL
008			021120s2020 ua ss ||| eng d
040			_aEAL _cEAL
041			_aeng _bara
090			_aART MUJPPP V11 No1 8
100	1		_aNawar , M. A. _932659
240	1	0	_aMansoura University Journal of plant protection and pathology, 2020 v. 11 (1) _h[electronic resource].
245	1	0	_aDirect and indirect impact of Artemisia judaica extract on Euseius scutalis _h[electronic resource].
246	1	5	_aالتأثير المباشر والغير مباشر لنبات البعيثران (الشيح الخليلي) علي المفترس الاكاروسي Euseius scutalis
300			_ap. 37-40.
347			_atext file _bPDF
504			_aIncludes reference.
520			_aThe potential of extract of Artemisia Judaica L. against the predator Euseius scutalis (Athias- Henriot) and two kinds of prey that fed on them, first-instar nymphs of whitefly and second instar larvae of onion thrips, The results showed that, the effect of extract on B. tabaci nymphs recorded great decline in the rate of mortality to 26.8% compared to 81.6% respectively; The same results on T. tabaci larvae were increased from 23.95% to 77% respectively, by increasing the applied concentration from 125 to 2000 ppm., while when newly emerged E. scutalis adult treated with the same concentration of extract increased total percent mortality such increase was concentration dependent. Indirect exposure technique of is more effective than the direct exposure technique. Therefore, when using the plant extract and the predator in one control program is recommended to spray the extract first and then release the predator about 48 hours later.
546			_aSummary in Arabic.
650		0	_aArtemisia _928145
650		0	_aMites _917207 _xControl
700	1		_aImam, Iman I. _91318
773	0		_tMansoura University Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology. _g2020.v.11(1) _7nnas _w62829
856	4	0	_uhttp://nile.enal.sci.eg/EALE/2020/MUJPPP/1120/1/37.pdf _zFull Text Article.
942			_cAR _2alc
999			_c66158 _d66158