Comparative study of nitrogen bioremoval from aquaculture wastewater using bioflocs technique (BFT) versus biofiltration system [electronic resource].

By: Language: English Summary language: Arabic Description: p.1083-1102Other title:
  • دراسة مقارنة لإزالة النيتروجين حيويا من مياه صرف المزارع السمكية باستخدام تقنية الندف البيولوجية مقابل نظام الترشيح الحيوى [Added title page title]
Uniform titles:
  • Misr journal of agricultural engineering, 2017 v.34 (2) [electronic resource].
Subject(s): Online resources: In: Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering 2017.v.34(2)Summary: LaboratOlY experiment aimed to comparison between treatment offish wastewater /Ising biofloc technology (8FT) and bioJilter system to re-use water and reduce its change periods. Ammonium concentration increased from 0.51 mg/I at beginning of experiment to 0.5-4 mg/I and decreased to 0.25 mg/I and is .fixed at 0.49 mg/I for biofilter samples. While, these concentrations ware 0.62- 0.87-0.12-0.27 mg/I for biofloc treatment samples. Ammonium reduction ratio of biofilter was 32% versus 17.33% for biofloc technique at beginning of experiment then it still increasing and reached to 42 % for biofilter against 7.45% of biofloc technique. Unexpected decrease in the ammonium reduction ratio for biofilter system by 21.87 and 15.52% versus 62.50 and 53.45% correspondingly for biofloc. These results were referred to biofiltration process adaptation and lack of uniformity of bioflocs throughout whole water tank. Results of measured ammonium concentrations show superiority of the use of biofloc technique over bioJilter system. The decline in nitrite reduction ratio for biofilter of 63.16% at the second week of the start of experiment happened and then there was a slight increase in nitrite reduction ratio 63.49% to be settled on the 65% reduction ratio value. This was referred to biofilter clogging and biomass accumulation. Biofloc technique demonstrated an excessive superiority (93.02%) in nitrite reduction ratio at beginning of the experiment over biofilter system (70.54%). Two systems had similar behavior of nitrite reduction ratio throughollt the rest of experiment. Finally, use of BFT systems to freshwater tilapia aquaculture benefits both the reduction in ammonium and nitrite concentrations and can be effective in improvementfish production.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Includes references.

LaboratOlY experiment aimed to comparison between treatment offish
wastewater /Ising biofloc technology (8FT) and bioJilter system to re-use
water and reduce its change periods. Ammonium concentration
increased from 0.51 mg/I at beginning of experiment to 0.5-4 mg/I and
decreased to 0.25 mg/I and is .fixed at 0.49 mg/I for biofilter samples.
While, these concentrations ware 0.62- 0.87-0.12-0.27 mg/I for biofloc
treatment samples. Ammonium reduction ratio of biofilter was 32%
versus 17.33% for biofloc technique at beginning of experiment then it
still increasing and reached to 42 % for biofilter against 7.45% of
biofloc technique. Unexpected decrease in the ammonium reduction ratio
for biofilter system by 21.87 and 15.52% versus 62.50 and 53.45%
correspondingly for biofloc. These results were referred to biofiltration
process adaptation and lack of uniformity of bioflocs throughout whole
water tank. Results of measured ammonium concentrations show
superiority of the use of biofloc technique over bioJilter system. The
decline in nitrite reduction ratio for biofilter of 63.16% at the second
week of the start of experiment happened and then there was a slight
increase in nitrite reduction ratio 63.49% to be settled on the 65%
reduction ratio value. This was referred to biofilter clogging and
biomass accumulation. Biofloc technique demonstrated an excessive
superiority (93.02%) in nitrite reduction ratio at beginning of the
experiment over biofilter system (70.54%). Two systems had similar
behavior of nitrite reduction ratio throughollt the rest of experiment.
Finally, use of BFT systems to freshwater tilapia aquaculture benefits
both the reduction in ammonium and nitrite concentrations and can be
effective in improvementfish production.

Summary in Arabic.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Home | About ENAL | Collections | Services | Activities | Calendar | Contact us

7 Nadi El Sayed St., Gizah, Egypt | Phone: +02-33351313 | Fax: 202 33351302 | Email: enalegypt@gmail.com