Performance of a pyramid solar still using air-cooled glass cover [electronic resource]: an experimental study
Language: English Summary language: Arabic Description: p. 359-376Other title:- .آداء المقطر الشمسي الهرمي بإستخدام الغطاء الزجاجي المبرد بالهواء:دراسة تجريبية [Added title page title]
- Misr journal of agricultural engineering, 2018 v.35 (1) [electronic resource].
Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles | Main | ART MJAE V35 NO1 20 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available |
Includes bibliographic reference.
Cooling the glass cover is considered one of the most effective modifications that affecting the performance of any solar still, particularly
at summer season. Many previous studies focused on the water cooling glass cover, but it is important to study another cooling technique to avoid
using potable or saline water in this process. Thus, this study aims to investigate the possibility of enhancing the performance of a passive square
pyramid-shaped solar still in summer season through cooling the glass cover using controlled stream of cooled air. For this purpose, the solar still
was coupled to ice-cooling unit provided with a high pressure fan in trial to reduce the temperature of the blowing ambient air over the glass cover.
Solar still performance was evaluated using saline water (15000ppm) depth of 4cm without cooling as a control treatment and air-cooled glass cover
under different values of air velocities and cooling tactics with taking into consideration the solar still temperatures, productivity and
instantaneous efficiency. The obtained results revealed that, the increase of the cooled air velocity from 1.4 m/s (natural wind) to 5 m/s and
cooling tactic of 20minon -10min off gave a remarkable increase in water-inner glass temperature difference (?Twgi) from 10 to 21°C and the
productivity from 0.505 to 0.645 L/m2.h at the peak performance hour which led to achieve the highest accumulated yield of 3.545 L/m2.day and
instantaneous efficiency of 43.2% with an increment of about 17 and 10.8%, respectively higher than solar still without cooling. Additionally,
the air velocity of 7 m/s has irrelevant effect on the solar still performance, but on the contrary it gave less improvement. Hence, it is obvious
that the air-cooled glass cover enhanced the solar still performance.
Summary in Arabic.
There are no comments on this title.